The recent revelation of the construction of a vast train barrier by Russian forces in occupied Donetsk Oblast, known as the “tsar train”, has drawn attention to a historical military tactic recognised as the “wagon fort.”

This ancient strategy, documented as far back as Roman times by historians such as Ammianus Marcellinus, involves arranging wagons into defensive formations to create makeshift fortifications.

While the term may vary across cultures and historical contexts, the underlying principle remains consistent: to establish a defensive perimeter using available resources.

The construction of the “tsar train” barrier in occupied Donetsk Oblast draws an intriguing parallel to two other iconic Russian historical artefacts: the Tsar Cannon and the Tsar Bell.

Both of these colossal creations, intended as impressive showpieces, ultimately proved impractical for functional use due to their immense size.

The Tsar Cannon, renowned for its extraordinary dimensions and ornate design, was commissioned by Tsar Ivan the Terrible in the 16th century.

However, despite its imposing appearance and elaborate decorations, the cannon was never utilised in battle. Instead, it became a symbol of Russian military prowess and imperial grandeur, primarily serving as a ceremonial object.

Similarly, the Tsar Bell, cast in the 18th century during the reign of Empress Anna Ivanovna, stands as one of the largest bells ever cast.

Yet, despite its intended purpose as a functional bell for the Ivan the Great Bell Tower in Moscow, it was never successfully hung or rung due to its massive size.

Instead, it suffered damage during a fire and remained stationary, becoming yet another symbolic representation of Russian craftsmanship and ambition.

In the case of the “tsar train” barrier in Donetsk Oblast, the use of over 2,100 freight cars stretching 30 kilometres signifies a modern adaptation of the age-old tactic of “wagon fort”.

Similar to how wagon forts were employed by various historical armies, including the Hussites, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, Cossacks, and settlers in South Africa, the train barrier serves as a defensive line against potential threats, notably Ukrainian military advances.

The concept of the wagon fort revolves around the flexibility and adaptability of its design. Whether arranged in a rectangle, circle, or other formations, the wagons provide protection for troops and supplies, creating a temporary stronghold in the midst of conflict.

This versatility is mirrored in the construction of the train barrier, which spans a considerable distance and may serve multiple strategic purposes beyond mere defence.

Historically, wagon forts have been utilised in various contexts, from military campaigns to pioneer expeditions.

In the United States, similar defensive formations known as corrals were employed by 19th-century settlers travelling westward in convoys of Conestoga wagons.

These makeshift fortifications offered a degree of security against hostile forces and served as rallying points during attacks.

The construction of the “tsar train” barrier underscores the enduring relevance of ancient military tactics for the Russians.

While the tools and technologies may have evolved, Russia is still deploying these ancient tactics. As conflicts persist and geopolitical tensions escalate, the lessons of history similar to the one that Putin gave to Tacker Carlson last week, continue to inform Russian military strategies.

Click here for more on Russia at EU Today

———————————————————————————————————————————–