One of the most significant problems within the Ukrainian diaspora worldwide and in particular the United States, where it matters most, is the lack of political sophistication.

Intentions are mostly good, but they are not informed and aimed so as not to interfere with one’s personal life no matter how banal.

The Ukraine issue is tangential or marginal. which suggests that it is not a priority. The bottom line is that there is no war strategy.

There are numerous examples for this characterisation. Case in point is recognising that the war in Ukraine is 10 years old and the full scale atrocities are 2 years old.

Many organisations have spent time and even resources organising events for this occasion.

These events have taken myriad forms: demonstrations, vigils, conferences and, frankly, I have no idea how to characterise events organised by the Ukrainian Institute of America in New York City.

Essentially it was announced almost as an Institute touring exercise.

There was an interesting event which I attended at the Cooper Union Great Hall, historically the site of a speech by President Abraham Lincoln.

It had possibilities for strategic success, meaning helping Ukraine because of the venue, myriad sponsorship by relatively important partners including universities, at least one recognisable speaker and the very acute problems facing Ukraine today.

The main speaker was Oleksandra Matviichuk, the president of the Center for Civil Liberties, a recent Ukrainian Nobel laureate.

Her virtual presentation was eloquent, informative, moving, and emotional.

She made a significant observation albeit erroneous that in recent history (the last one hundred years) the only case of punishment against an aggressor was through the Nuremberg Tribunal.

She suggested the need for a similar tribunal to punish Russia for its war crimes today.

What she failed to mention was the need for victory in order for that or any existing tribunal to act and implement in decisions or verdicts.

She did mention support, but failed to call specifically for ammunition in order for Ukraine to achieve that victory. That should have been the focus of her presentation.

There were other speakers and a round table discussion which mostly bemoaned how much the Ukrainians have suffered during the war.

The moderator did not focus on the strategic immediate needs of Ukraine.

Towards the end she did raise the issue of very little time remaining the discussants merely touched upon this important and very complex topic where there are issues of jurisdiction, criminal intent and evidence involving the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.

This was an opportunity to help Ukraine in the war. It turned into an academic discussion. Perhaps worse, it gave many in the audience a satisfaction that by attending they had done their part in somehow assisting Ukraine’s war effort.

Such events could have an important role in garnering support for Ukraine particularly in the United States which after all is the strongest military and economic power in the world, but has and continues to experience problems with its identity as a foundational NATO member and the leading democracy in the world today to the point that the future of NATO is questioned.

Europeans are considering an alternative European defence structure, relying less and less upon American military capability.

The focus has to be on strategic and tangible assistance which is absolutely crucial today.

It should be stressed that Europe’s contribution to NATO is increasing annually and about two thirds of NATO members are fulfilling their 2% GDP budgetary commitment.

It should also be recognised that only once in its history has Article 5 of the NATO charter been invoked and that was to benefit the United States. These facts are anathema to most of the primitives within the Republican party. In America.

Ukraine needs to win the war. That must be the focus. It needs soldiers and ammunition.

Lamentations, condemnations, even international Court rulings are all important, but at the present time Ukraine needs shells, Patriots, Abrams. HIMARS, F-16”s.

Without victory there will be no punishment for war crimes or genocide. Worse there may not be a democratic Ukraine in the centre of Europe.

That should be the paramount strategic concern for the entire democratic world.

Click here for more by Askold S. Lozynskyj at EU Today

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Read also: “As long as Ukraine remains vulnerable, the entire Euro-Atlantic security system remains vulnerable,” says Nobel Prize winner Oleksandra Matviichuk

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________